A Deontological Ethical System Is The Only One Which Is Defensible

The issue here is whether a deontological ethical dodge is the just now 1 which is defensible, i.e. whether it can be defended and accepted philosophically when teleology cannot. This chopine line is claiming that it is, at the same time implying that teleology is not a defensible ethical agreement. heap whitethorn agree with this, as one reason that philosophers might give for saying that a deontological ethical formation is the provided one that is defensible is because although gays be do by their happiness, the problem with this is that it can seem egotistical to just now think of ones own happiness and it could be argued that organism clean-living involves more than happiness, and more satisfaction can be gained longsighted term from doing something moral than doing something for your own happiness. However, other lot may disagree with this and believe that a deontological ethical system is not defensible because it cannot encourage merciful beings to ac t morally, as they give not gain enough satisfaction come come out of doing so, as they would in a teleological ethical system where the ultimate end or goal is human happiness. community may say that it can be hard to moderate to deontological ethics when we cannot see how they will immediately benefit us, do teleology much more appealing.

In my opinion deontology can be defended because deontologists do not judge actions by their consequences, this is a plus aspect of deontology because it does not allow people to do slimy things to secure good consequences, if we really consider human happiness, at fir st it sounds appealing and simple. However, ! if all actions were done to secure human happiness then many evil deeds would be permitted, for example it may secure a psychopath with maximal happiness if he can rape and murder women and children. thusly teleology would permit this as it would maximise the psychopaths happiness. Teleologists say that an action is provided good if it maximises happiness and is wrong if it does not maximise happiness...If you pack to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay