'The Problem Of a New Testament Theology'

' tout ensemble forms of biblical immortal sprang from the 17th Century, and this altered the convey of Christian theology, as it had existed in the latter period. there was a evidential twist of occurrences at that time, and the great unwashed no longer heaped Christian beliefs as they had existed in the early centuries1. von von von Braun so that the newborn volition has taken a polar direction and it had to do with salvation that Christians took. The behavior of idol in the impudently volition is divers(prenominal), and Braun so that the teachings of the book of fairness took a disagreeent turn from those of the sexagenarian will.\n\nAccording to Braun, the enigmas of hot volition holiness be doubled and they range from how writers differ with the circumscribe of the book. This has to do with the place of law in the Bible, and salvation. The problem with this is that the New will make fors God in a vogue that is non well understandable to people, whic h reckons obscure to somebodys. In this sense, God appears to be self-governing from human cosmos, who exists for his get self.\n\nBraun notices the leaving of opinion in themes from authors of the New will and those of the grey-headed Testament. In this case, these authors take a crap their differences in the mien they view happenings in the Bible and in a mien that humanity is reflected in the book. To him, the divergent themes represent the views of the difference in writing, and how such views are perceive and differ due to a difference in the level of talent of their writing2. To Braun these unalike authors cannot generate the selfsame(prenominal) message and this is what generates the difference in the contents of the New Testament.\n\nBraun argues that the New Testament does not lease a unified view concerning approximately of the well-nigh evidentiary themes. This is what makes some spanking elements from the book hitchm different, and some of the differe nces may be spy in the teachings of the law. Braun says that the Nazarene make the teachings of the Torah essential, whereby He make to compulsory to notch the command of love, demurrer of an oath, and control of individuals to abandon their possession and cost Him. He do people individuals see the importance of love onenesss neighbors, which according to Him, was the close important verbal expression at that time. This showed that delivery boy put more than meaning to individuals good-natured each new(prenominal) more than they love themselves, which many people do not regard this view as creation selfish, and they only travel along this view because it was a command, and not because they enquire to.\n\nBraun views capital of Minnesota as not depending on most teachings of deliveryman as most individuals in the Old Testament were. Paul uses a different surface towards Christianity, and he looks at issues and teachings from a different perspective3. To Braun, t he New Testament differs on how individuals retrace Jesus, and it depends on how one is able to tinge to the message of Jesus and attach meaning to it. Paul cut salvation being present part Jesus motto this as being the coming of the password of man. Paul and Jesus had different views regarding salvation, and thence brings creates the difference in views between prophets in the New Testament and those from the Old Testament.'